• About
  • Index
  • The Lost Domain

Through the dark labyrinth

Through the dark labyrinth

Tag Archives: critical theory

Marxism and science fiction

29 Monday Aug 2011

Posted by Paul Kincaid in Uncategorized

≈ Comments Off on Marxism and science fiction

Tags

critical theory, Istvan Csicsery-Ronay Jr

I am still puzzling my way through my response to Istvan Csicsery-Ronay Jr’s The Seven Beauties of Science Fiction. It is, I think, a necessary if somewhat belated corrective to the Marxist/Suvinian orthodoxy that is the common academic response to science fiction, in that he eases back on cognitive estrangement and is actually quite radical in his re-evaluation of the novum. But I’m still not sure that he goes far enough. Continue reading →

Language and Power

29 Monday Aug 2011

Posted by Paul Kincaid in Uncategorized

≈ Comments Off on Language and Power

Tags

critical theory, Istvan Csicsery-Ronay Jr, langauge and sf

It is becoming clear that reading The Seven Beauties of Science Fiction by Istvan Csicsery-Ronay, Jr is going to take a long time. Not because it is a difficult book; he uses rather more academic jargon than I think he realises, but it is not off-putting or impenetrable. No, the problem is that after just about every paragraph I have to stop and think, and then work my way through the various extraneous ideas that he has set going in my mind. Continue reading →

Modern Criticism and Theory: Shklovsky

29 Monday Aug 2011

Posted by Paul Kincaid in Uncategorized

≈ Comments Off on Modern Criticism and Theory: Shklovsky

Tags

critical theory, Victor Shklovsky

So now it’s time to move on to:

2: Victor Shklovsky, Art as technique Continue reading →

Modern Criticism and Theory: Saussure

29 Monday Aug 2011

Posted by Paul Kincaid in history of ideas

≈ Comments Off on Modern Criticism and Theory: Saussure

Tags

critical theory, Ferdinand de Saussure, Ludwig Wittgenstein

I am off work sick, my head feels as if it is stuffed with cotton wool, I have barely moved from bed all day and am too tired to stay awake and too awake to go to sleep, and to cap it all, yesterday when I started writing this we had a (minor) earthquake. Obviously, I am in the perfect frame of mind to tackle …

1: Ferdinand de Saussure, The Object of Study/Nature of the Linguistic Sign Continue reading →

Modern Criticism and Theory

29 Monday Aug 2011

Posted by Paul Kincaid in Uncategorized

≈ Comments Off on Modern Criticism and Theory

Tags

critical theory, David Lodge

This anthology of essays and extracts from books edited by David Lodge dates from 1988 so it is hardly the latest word on the subject. Nevertheless, its contents include many of the names I keep coming across in my more general reading, and since I feel like starting to engage with the theorists and not just the theories, it seemed a good place to start. And as I worked my way through the first couple of pieces, I realised it would help me sort out my response to what I’m reading if I wrote about it. So over the next few weeks, however long it takes me to work my way through the 28 pieces, I thought I would have a go at blogging the book. At this stage I have no idea if it will work, or if I will come up with anything remotely resembling a coherent response to the contents, but it’s worth having a go. Continue reading →

Texts and Contexts

21 Sunday Aug 2011

Posted by Paul Kincaid in Uncategorized

≈ 2 Comments

Tags

Adam Roberts, critical theory, Damien Broderick, Darko Suvin, Francis Godwin, Henry Neville, J.G. Ballard, John Clute, Margaret Cavendish

Back at the beginning of the month I read a book called Speaking with the Dead for review in The Journal of the Fantastic in the Arts, even though the book has practically nothing to do with science fiction or fantasy. It is devoted to a rather esoteric point of New Historicism (the whole book is built around one sentence in a work by Stephen Greenblatt) and I don’t want to say much more about it here since the review will be appearing in JFA. But I found myself considering one intriguing question in relation to the study of sf prompted by this book: why does so little sf criticism employ the tools of New Historicism? Continue reading →

Recent Comments

Chris on In the air
Gustavo on In the air
AshleyRPollard on Is there a point to science…
Paul Kincaid on Is there a point to science…
Paul Kincaid on Is there a point to science…

Archives

Blogroll

  • Big Other
  • Paper Knife
  • Ruthless Culture

Adam Roberts Arthur C. Clarke Award Arthur C Clarke books of the year Brian Aldiss Christopher Priest David Mitchell E.L. Doctorow Frederik Pohl Gene Wolfe George Orwell H.G. Wells Harlan Ellison Henry James Iain Banks Ian McEwan Ian Watson Isaac Asimov J.G. Ballard James Tiptree Jr John Banville John Clute John Crowley John W. Campbell Kate Atkinson Keith Roberts Kim Stanley Robinson Lucius Shepard Ludwig Wittgenstein Martin Amis Mary Shelley Maureen Kincaid Speller m john harrison nina allan Patrick Leigh Fermor Philip K. Dick Robert Heinlein Robert Holdstock Robert Silverberg Russell Hoban Samuel R. Delany Steve Erickson Thomas M. Disch Thomas More Ursula K. Le Guin Virginia Woolf William Boyd William Gibson William Shakespeare Winston Churchill

Create a free website or blog at WordPress.com.

Privacy & Cookies: This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this website, you agree to their use.
To find out more, including how to control cookies, see here: Cookie Policy
  • Follow Following
    • Through the dark labyrinth
    • Join 174 other followers
    • Already have a WordPress.com account? Log in now.
    • Through the dark labyrinth
    • Customize
    • Follow Following
    • Sign up
    • Log in
    • Report this content
    • View site in Reader
    • Manage subscriptions
    • Collapse this bar